Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society

California Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1944No. S. F. 16498; S. F. 16499; S. F. 16501PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

The complaints in these eases contain substantially the same allegations as those in the Maguire case (ante, p. 719 [146 P.2d 673]), differing only in allegations respecting deraignment of title and amounts of deposits. The demurrers and the motions under section 1061 of the Code of Civil Procedure cover the same grounds as the demurrer and similar motion in the Maguire case. The decision in that case is therefore determinative of the main questions presented on these appeals.

A further problem is presented here, however, by the order of the trial court dismissing these actions upon the ground…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Brandt v. BrandtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pianka v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Holden v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Arnold v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Dorsey v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Witczak v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API