Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society

California Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1944No. S. F. No. 16495; S. F. No. 16497; S. F. No. 16502PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

The above entitled eases are companion to Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society et al., this day decided. (Ante, p. 719 [146 P.2d 673].)

Plaintiffs claim membership in the society as assignees of various persons, who, it is alleged, entered into “contracts of membership ’ ’ with the society between 1859 and 1864, by signing the bylaws of 1859 and paying the entrance fee of two dollars. The complaints contain but one count which is similar to the first count of the complaint in the Maguire ease. The only material difference is that the complaints herein show that there has been no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Cont'l Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. BoggessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Saunders v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pianka v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. FishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Petersen v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Wiler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Buffalo Arms, Inc. v. Remler Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API