Brandt v. Brandt
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Ralph Woods Pontious, and D. M. McDonald, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The court below sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s second amended complaint, without leave to amend, and entered judgment in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
The complaint in question is in two counts. The first alleges that the parties intermarried on the twenty-seventh day of July, 1895, and ever since have been husband and wife. On the twentieth day of March, 1901, the defendant, without any cause, left and abandoned the plaintiff, against her will and consent, and has ever since refused to return to her and live with her. Since June, 1903, the defendant has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MacDonald v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Hand v. ScodelettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Whiting v. HeslepCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Greenwood v. MooradianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Ritter v. RitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hiltbrand v. HiltbrandIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- J. P. Armstrong v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.