eds Adjusters, Inc. v. Computer Sciences Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, eds Adjusters, Inc. and Edward D. Szysko, Jr., have filed a motion for reconsideration of this Court’s Order of April 16, 1993, 818 F.Supp. 120, in which the Court dismissed Count II in part, Count III and directed plaintiffs to file a more definite statement of Count I. The purpose of such a motion is to allow the court the opportunity to correct any manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence which would provide a basis for this Court to vacate, alter or modify said rulings. Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki 779 F.2d 906,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Stadler v. McCullochDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995