Briles v. Paulson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. The case presents a situation very similar to that recently considered by this court in Briles v. Paulson, ante, p. 196, [149 Pac. 169], Thomas Briles had there sued for the annulment of a contract whereby the defendant’s predecessor was given an option to purchase certain lands. One of the provisions of the contract was that the holder of the option should, within a given time, do certain work upon a reservoir dam. The contract provided that if the proposed purchaser should fail to carry out any of the stipulations on his part…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Briles v. PaulsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barcroft v. LivacichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Schreiber v. HookerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Cross v. RamdullahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Caldwell v. Dalaray Mines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1945