Legal Opinion

Briles v. Paulson

California Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1915No. Sac. No. 2129PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. The case presents a situation very similar to that recently considered by this court in Briles v. Paulson, ante, p. 196, [149 Pac. 169], Thomas Briles had there sued for the annulment of a contract whereby the defendant’s predecessor was given an option to purchase certain lands. One of the provisions of the contract was that the holder of the option should, within a given time, do certain work upon a reservoir dam. The contract provided that if the proposed purchaser should fail to carry out any of the stipulations on his part…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Briles v. PaulsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barcroft v. LivacichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Schreiber v. HookerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Cross v. RamdullahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  4. Caldwell v. Dalaray Mines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API