Newburger v. State Bank
City of New York Municipal Court
Motions by both parties for the direction of a verdict.
1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.
Mo evidence being introduced by the defendant, the motions for a direction made by each of the litigants will depend upon the value of the testimony adduced by the plaintiff. That testimony indicates that the plaintiff, who was a depositor of the defendant, was entitled to a credit of $550, and that the defendant had not repaid the same. Resting on that evidence, the defendant demanded a direction in its favor. Likewise assured by the testimony, the plaintiff asserted a right to a direction in her favor. The determination of these conflicting claims requires consideration of the question…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Conkling v. . WeatherwaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Cochran v. ReichNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Hicks-Alixanian v. WaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Wasserstrom v. Public BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
- Dose v. Hirsch Bros.City of New York Municipal Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eads v. Commercial National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1928