Dose v. Hirsch Bros.

I am of the opinion that defendants’ appropriate motion would have been for a modification of the order of Mr. Justice Sehmuck, entered March 30, 1910, to the extent of permitting defendants to have further time to make a motion to aniend the answer, particularly in view of the subsequent order made by the same justice on the 5th day of April, 1910; but inasmuch as the notice of motion prays “ for such other and further relief in the premises as to the court may seem just and proper,” I will consider the motion as a motion for such modification and for permission to •amend the answer. This is…