Legal Opinion

Wasserstrom v. Public Bank

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 24, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by Louis Wasserstrom against the Public Bank. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The complaint alleged “that on or about the 30th of September, 1909, the plaintiff delivered to the defendant the sum of $319.80, which it received on deposit and agreed to pay to this plaintiff on demand,” followed by the allegations, in substance, that thereafter the plaintiff duly 'demanded the repayment of this sum on October 31, 1909, which defendant refused, and still refuses, to pay. At the close of plaintiff’s case, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground of failure of proof. It appeared at that time that plain*56tiff had had an open and running account with defendant from…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Citizens State Bank v. WordenNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Newburger v. State BankCity of New York Municipal Court · 1910
  3. Lifschutz v. Public BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API