Legal Opinion
Ferency v. Secretary of State
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1980No. Docket Nos. 65764, 65765, 65882. (Calendar No. 1, 2)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
On September 4, 1980, the Ingham Circuit Court issued an order which, inter alia, stated:
"[T]his court declares the Tisch’ proposal, and any and all such petitions filed with defendant Secretary of State are legally insufficient and that the said proposal is not entitled to placement on the ballot scheduled for the November, 1980, General Election.”
The order further provided that the defendant Secretary of State, the defendant Director of Elections, and the defendant Board of State Canvassers were to take "no steps whatsoever to effectuate placement of such proposal on said ballot”. Finally,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- School District v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Kuhn v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Jackson v. Com'r of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Thompson v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Scott v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- Mayor of Detroit v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- McGee v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Citizens for Protection of Marriage v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Gracey v. Grosse Pointe Farms ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.