Legal Opinion

Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action & Integration v. Bd. of State Canvassers

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 2004No. Docket Nos. 254652, 254653PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

686 N.W.2d 287 (2004)

262 Mich.App. 395

COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION & INTEGRATION, and Fight for Equality by any Means Necessary (BAMN), United for Equality and Affirmative Action, Michigan Legislative Black Caucus, and AFSCME Local 207 and 312, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross Appellants,

v.

BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Appellee.

Citizens for United Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant,

v.

Board of State Canvassers, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Appellee.

Docket Nos. 254652, 254653.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Submitted June 8, 2004, at Lansing.

Decided June 11, 2004,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. School District v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Kuhn v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bloomfield Charter Township v. Oakland County ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Forton v. Waterford Township Department of Parks & RecreationMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ferency v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. the People Should Decide v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Michigan Civil Rights Initiative v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Stand up for Democracy v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Brenda Stumbo v. Karen Lovejoy RoeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Brenda Stumbo v. Karen Lovejoy RoeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API