Legal Opinion

State v. Knutson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 31, 1995No. C8-95-1093PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

The district court granted appellant newspaper’s motion to quash the subpoena of its unpublished photographs. Respondent State of Minnesota moved successfully for reconsideration; the district court then ordered the photographs produced for in camera inspection. The newspaper appeals from that order. Because we find no error in the district court’s refusal to quash the subpoena of the newspaper’s unpublished photographs, we affirm.

FACTS

On October 22, 1993, a rally on the University of Minnesota campus broke into an altercation during which respondent Kieran Knutson 1…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard KuhnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Bruno & Stillman, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Cuthbertson, Gerald M. Appeal of Cbs Inc., Third Party WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. Charleston Mail Ass'n v. RansonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bauer v. Gannett Co., Inc.(KARE 11)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Weinberger v. Maplewood ReviewCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State Ex Rel. Charleston Mail Ass'n v. RansonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API