Legal Opinion

Sellars v. First National Bank in Henderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRNHill, J.

The defendants are not prosecuting a claim against the administrator which had been denied. They are merely asserting the right to apply the proceeds of collateral in their possession to the satisfaction of obligations for the payment of which, said collateral was pledged. Furthermore, the original administrator signed the creditor’s agreement, and the agreement entered into by him with the' bank at the time said deposit was made expressly recites that neither party waives any rights or defenses. C. S., 100 has no application and the defendants are not barred by the terms thereof from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hare v. . WeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Atkins v. White Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Jeffries v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Crawford v. . CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Gregory v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API