Legal Opinion
State v. Twin Falls Land & Water Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Lee, J.
— This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of the eleventh judicial district, awarding a writ of mandate to respondent George W. Rice, commanding appellants to forthwith enter into a contract with respondent to sell him a water right for certain lands which he had purchased from the state, this right to be out of the Twin Falls Canal Company’s system, and to be furnished according to the terms and conditions of a contract between appellant Twin Falls Land & Water Company and the state of Idaho, made January 2, 1903. The writ directs that this sale contract shall not contain any…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Twin Falls-Salmon River Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Gerber v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Lewis v. Mountain Home Co-operative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Willow River Water Users Ass'n v. Orchards Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Idaho Irrigation Co. v. GoodingSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- North Side Canal Co. v. Idaho Farms Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Twin Falls Land & Water Co. v. Twin Falls Canal Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1933
- Twin Falls Land & Water Co. v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.