Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Guernsey v. Meilike

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Waupaca County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.

This is an action in quo wa/rrcmto to inquire by what warrant the defendant holds the office of mayor of the city of Clintonville. The jury found that the defendant has no right to said office, and that he be ousted and excluded therefrom, and that the ‘relator is and has been entitled to said office since April 4,1890. This appeal is taken from the judgment entered according to said verdict. The only facts necessary to be stated are as follows:

At an election held April 7,1891, in said city, the defendant and one Jacob Bentz were rival candidates, and were voted for, for the office of mayor.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Attorney-General ex rel. Bashford v. BarstowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Attorney-General ex rel. Carpenter v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  3. State ex rel. Holden v. TierneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  4. State ex rel. Dunning v. GilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1849
  5. State ex rel. Burnett v. PierpontWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brooks v. FranshamMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. State ex rel. Smallwood v. WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Joshua L. Kaul v. Frederick PrehnWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Warren v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API