Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Burnett v. Pierpont

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1872PublishedCited by 7 opinions

QUO WARRANTO to try tbe respondent’s title to tbe office of county clerk.

1Opinion of the CourtLyon, J.

This is an action of quo warranto, commenced in tbis court. Tbe relator and tbe defendant have filed a stipulation, signed by them respectively, -“that tbe case be beard and determined by tbe court upon tbe complaint filed therein as true; and for tbe purposes of tbe trial tbe respondent admits its truth. ”

The facts alleged in tbe complaint, and which, by virtue of such stipulation, are to be taken and held to be tbe facts in tbe case, are briefly as follows: At the general election held in tbe county of Manitowoc, on tbe sixth day of November, 1870, one Peter P. Tussenicb was duly and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Attorney-General ex rel. Carpenter v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wood v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. State Ex Rel. First National Bank of Wisconsin Rapids v. M & I Peoples Bank of ColomaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. McDill v. Board of State Canvassers & the Secretary of StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  4. State ex rel. Swenson v. NortonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  5. State ex rel. Guernsey v. MeilikeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API