Legal Opinion

Bacher v. Higgins

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 1934No. 14681PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LECHE, Judge ad hoc.

The only question we are considering at this time is whether or not the reconven-tional demand is properly before us on appeal. The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s suit at his cost, and dismissed defendant’s demand in rcconvention at defendant’s cost. Plaintiff appealed. Defendant did not appeal but filed his answer to plaintiff’s appeal and prayed “that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed in so far as it dismisses plaintiff’s suit at his cost, but that the judgment of the said lower court be reversed so as to allow your appearer, Donald Higgins, plaintiff in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gormley v. GormleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Grapico Bottling Works v. Liquid Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Lange v. BarancoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  4. Clement Bros. v. Their CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
  5. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railroad v. TraylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alengi v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Bacher v. HigginsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API