Legal Opinion

Bacher v. Higgins

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1934No. 14681PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

This is an action ex delicto in which William Bacher claims of Donald Higgins $281 for personal injuries and for damage sustained by his Studebaker automobile when that car, driven by Bacher, came into collision with a Ford automobile owned and driven by Donald Higgins.

Higgins, denying fault on his part and charging that the proximate cause of the collision was the negligence of Bacher, by re-conventional demand claims of Bacher the sum of $404.05 for personal injuries and for damage sustained by his Ford automobile.

In the. First city court for the city of New Orleans there was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Battalora v. Carnahan CreameryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Bacher v. HigginsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wise v. PrescottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API