Bacher v. Higgins
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JANVIER, Judge.
This is an action ex delicto in which William Bacher claims of Donald Higgins $281 for personal injuries and for damage sustained by his Studebaker automobile when that car, driven by Bacher, came into collision with a Ford automobile owned and driven by Donald Higgins.
Higgins, denying fault on his part and charging that the proximate cause of the collision was the negligence of Bacher, by re-conventional demand claims of Bacher the sum of $404.05 for personal injuries and for damage sustained by his Ford automobile.
In the. First city court for the city of New Orleans there was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Battalora v. Carnahan CreameryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bacher v. HigginsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wise v. PrescottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962