Riddle v. Leuschner
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
S. H. Riddle commenced this action for declaratory and other relief against Yosemite Creek Company, Kadota Creek Company, and most of the shareholders, officers and directors of the two companies, both of which were California corporations. He was a creditor of Yosemite and sought to hold the other defendants for the amount due from Yosemite, -alleging that each of the corporations was the alter ego of the individual defendants. Subsequently the trial court permitted the joinder as plaintiffs of a number of other creditors of Yosemite who sought similar relief.
During the course of the suit…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Boon Global Limited v. Usdc-CaoakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. HickeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.