Legal Opinion

In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 19, 1986No. 19-10445PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER DENYING LOCKHEED’S CLAIM FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES

BURTON R. LIFLAND, Bankruptcy Judge.

Lockheed Corporation (“Lockheed”), in Claim Number M52100, seeks $195,463.09 in attorneys’ fees and expenses from the debtor, O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc. (“O.P.M.”). Lockheed incurred these fees defending a suit in Iowa brought by a third party, Steel Warehousing Inc. (“Steel”). Steel had instituted that suit to quiet title to certain computer equipment it purchased from O.P.M. and to which Lockheed also claimed title. Lockheed argues that because O.P.M. allegedly breached express…

2Cases cited20 opinions

Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. L. E. Riffe, O. Homer Riffe and Thomas J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
Hassett v. Revlon, Inc. (In Re O. P. M. Leasing Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
Doyle v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
Artvale, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent v. Rugby Fabrics Corp. And Barmil Associates, Ltd., Defendants-Respondents-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

EZ Tag Corp. v. Casio America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012