Legal Opinion

State v. Martin, Unpublished Decision (8-16-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 2007No. 06CA3110UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶ 1} Steve Martin appeals the Scioto County Common Pleas Court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court, without an evidentiary hearing, found that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Martin's untimely petition. On appeal, Martin contends that because he only discovered certain evidence recently, he is excepted from the 180-day period to file petition. Because Martin could have discovered all the evidence that he submitted with his petition within the 180-day period, we disagree. Martin next contends that because the United States…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DickessOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. Reine, 06ca3102 (12-11-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. McCreeryOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. RuppenOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API