Legal Opinion

Hildebrandt v. Stephan

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John M. Curran, J.

Plaintiff has moved for an order compelling defendant to appear for “an additional 4-hour session” of his deposition. Defendant opposes this request essentially on the grounds that plaintiff has waived any further deposition session by expressly consenting to the conclusion of the deposition.

At the initial oral argument on the motion, the court asked for a complete copy of the defendant’s deposition transcript. Following its review of that transcript, the court interposed certain questions to the parties concerning plaintiffs complaints in her motion…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Hoenig v. WestphalNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Kavanagh v. Ogden Allied Maintenance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API