Legal Opinion

New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Telegraph Co. v. Dolan

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 16, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The entire question here involved is one of statutory interpretation. The research of counsel has, admittedly, disclosed no statute of any other jurisdiction bearing any similarity to the one before this court, nor has a thorough examination by this court brought any to light. Citations of other courts, can, therefore, be of no assistance, and we must look to the statute itself for its true meaning. While the issue is a narrow one, the question is important and interesting, and its answer may, like most cases of pure statutory interpretation, be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harder's Fire Proof Storage & Van Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Matter of Application of SchulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Lewis & Clarke CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Denver City Railway Co. v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Telegraph Co. v. DolanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. EverettCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959
  4. American Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. EverettCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959
  5. Layton v. State Ex Rel. HazzardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1843

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API