Legal Opinion

Layton v. State Ex Rel. Hazzard

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 5, 1843Published

Writ of error to the Justices of the Superior Court in Sussex county. Coram, Johns, Jr., Chancellor, Milligan, Justice, and Wm. H. Rogers, a judge ad litem in place of Judge Layton. The case came up on a writ of error to the judgment of the Superior Court in Sussex county, in an action of debt on an administration bond, dated 11th January, 1826, at the suit of the State for the use of Wm.

Read the full summary

Writ of error to the Justices of the Superior Court in Sussex county. Coram, Johns, Jr., Chancellor, Milligan, Justice, and Wm. H. Rogers, a judge ad litem in place of Judge Layton. The case came up on a writ of error to the judgment of the Superior Court in Sussex county, in an action of debt on an administration bond, dated 11th January, 1826, at the suit of the State for the use of Wm. Hazzard and wife, a legatee of John Wilson, dec’d., against Caleb S. Layton, who was administrator of the said John Wilson. (See ante 469.) The defendant in the action below craved oyer of the bond, set out…

1Opinion of the Court

WRIT OF ERROR to the Justices of the Superior Court in Sussex county. The case came up on a writ of error to the judgment of the Superior Court in Sussex county, in an action of debt on an administration bond, dated 11th January, 1826, at the suit of the State for the use of Wm. Hazzard and wife, a legatee of John Wilson, dec'd., against Caleb S. Layton, who was administrator of the said John Wilson. (See ante 469.) The defendant in the action below craved oyer of the bond, set out the condition, which was in the usual form, and pleaded among other pleas, payment and a set-off for necessaries…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Telegraph Co. v. DolanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API