Legal Opinion

Stone v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 8, 1911No. 516; No. 527PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General-Appraisers, Abstract 24331 (T. D. 31134).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The importations the subjects of controversy in these two cases are, as to the first-entitled cause, currycombs, hoof picks, rack chains with two snaps, a swivel, and a ring, horse clippers, and parts' of horse clippers. As to the second-entitled cause, whip thongs, lip straps, bridle fronts, pony bridles, and leather-covered buckles.

The above-described importations of Stone & Co. and Bartley Bros. & Hall, which were the subject of protest in the first-entitled cause were classified as “manufactures of metal and manufactures of leather, and dutiable, respectively, at the rate of 45 per cent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roosevelt v. MaxwellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1856
  2. The HarrietU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1840

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  2. York Feather & Down Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Watson v. York Metal & Alloys Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API