Stone v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General-Appraisers, Abstract 24331 (T. D. 31134).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
The importations the subjects of controversy in these two cases are, as to the first-entitled cause, currycombs, hoof picks, rack chains with two snaps, a swivel, and a ring, horse clippers, and parts' of horse clippers. As to the second-entitled cause, whip thongs, lip straps, bridle fronts, pony bridles, and leather-covered buckles.
The above-described importations of Stone & Co. and Bartley Bros. & Hall, which were the subject of protest in the first-entitled cause were classified as “manufactures of metal and manufactures of leather, and dutiable, respectively, at the rate of 45 per cent…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roosevelt v. MaxwellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1856
- The HarrietU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1840
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
- York Feather & Down Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Watson v. York Metal & Alloys Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927