Legal Opinion · Dissent

Watson v. York Metal & Alloys Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 9, 1927No. 2636Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Graham, Presiding Judge:

I find myself unable to concur in the opinion of the majority in this case.

The material imported was gathered from the steel mills of England and consisted of the turnings or machine waste arising from the manufacture of high-speed tools, and was steel which had a tungsten content of from 13 to 14 per centum. The evidence shows that this material is chiefly used in the manufacture of high-speed tools, as an alloy, with an occasional use in making valves for automobiles and airplane engines. In use it is added, in its condition as imported, and cold,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lehn & Fink Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Monticelli Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
  4. Koch v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. Sonneborn Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API