Legal Opinion

Hendry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1990No. 1647 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

This is an appeal by Thomas O. Hendry (Claimant) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the Referee’s decision to grant Miller and Norford’s, Inc. (Employer) petition to modify Claimant’s benefits to $199.89 per week. The benefits were modified because of Claimant’s failure to apply for positions that were made available to him by Employer’s insurance carrier’s rehabilitation agent. While not denying that he was physically able to perform the jobs made available, Claimant contends that the positions he failed to apply for were not suitable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. State Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Korol v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Yezovich v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Mason v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Bissland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. M & D Auto Body v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API