Hendry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
This is an appeal by Thomas O. Hendry (Claimant) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the Referee’s decision to grant Miller and Norford’s, Inc. (Employer) petition to modify Claimant’s benefits to $199.89 per week. The benefits were modified because of Claimant’s failure to apply for positions that were made available to him by Employer’s insurance carrier’s rehabilitation agent. While not denying that he was physically able to perform the jobs made available, Claimant contends that the positions he failed to apply for were not suitable…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- State Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by17 opinions
- Korol v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Yezovich v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Mason v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Bissland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- M & D Auto Body v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.