Legal Opinion
Cinergy Corp. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 17, 2003No. 49A02-0206-CV-503PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
Cinergy Corporation, PSI Energy, Inc., and The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. (collectively, Cinergy) challenge two trial court determinations that the Hendricks Superior Court, not the Marion Superior Court, should adjudicate Cinergy's dispute with St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company (St. Paul), and with multiple other insurance carriers, concerning coverage for environmental damage. 1 We affirm.
Issues
Cinergy presents four issues, which we consolidate and restate as:
I. Whether the Marion Superior Court properly dismissed Ciner-gy's declaratory judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Russell Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Davidson v. PerronIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Shelter Insurance Co. v. WoolemsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Terre Haute Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Pivarnik v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Safety National Casualty Co. v. Cinergy Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Cinergy Corp. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Keith v. DooleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.