Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Perron

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 1999No. 43A03-9902-CV-63PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*32OPINION

NAJAM, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Bruce Davidson, pro se, appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his two count “Amended Complaint for Civil Rights Violations, Defamation, and Libel” against Mayor James Perron (the “Mayor”) and the City of Elkhart, Indiana (the “City”). The trial court dismissed Count I of Davidson’s complaint because Davidson failed to comply with the notice requirements of the Indiana Tort Claims Act. The trial court dismissed Count II of Davidson’s complaint after concluding that the same or similar action was pending in another state court. On cross-appeal, the Mayor…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McQueen v. Fayette County School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Ratliff v. CohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Thompson v. City of AuroraIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Fager v. HundtIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. VanValkenburg v. WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Eddie Trail and Katrinka Trail v. Boys and Girls Clubs of Northwest IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Dugan v. Mittal Steel USA Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Jeffrey M. Miller and Cynthia S. Miller v. Central Indiana Community Foundation, Inc., and Brian PayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Brown v. AlexanderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Branham v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API