Legal Opinion

Pivarnik v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1994No. 75S00-9311-CV-1305PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SULLIVAN, Justice.

This case arises out of a misunderstanding of Indiana Trial Rule 14 and third-party practice generally under the Indiana Trial Rules. 1 We write in order to aid the courts and practitioners in their efforts to understand and apply the Rules in accord with the language of the Rules themselves and with the policies that the Rules are designed to promote.

Facts

While digging a pond in August of 1991, a bulldozer owned by G.V.K. Corporation (GVK) struck a natural gas pipeline belonging to Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO). There was an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Taylor v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. State Ex Rel. Young v. Noble Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. City of Elkhart v. MiddletonIndiana Supreme Court · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Heritage Development of Indiana, Inc. v. Opportunity Options, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Buckalew v. BuckalewIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. KapitanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. United of Omaha v. HieberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Centex Home Equity Corp. v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API