Legal Opinion

Gard v. Estate of Holmes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1931No. 29,754PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This action originated in a demand against the estate of J. C. Holmes, deceased, late of Sedgwick county.

The demand was based upon three promissory notes for $300 each, dated February 11,1922, with due dates of one and two years thereafter and bearing interest at 8 per cent. These notes were signed by J. C. Holmes, E. B. Holmes and Mrs. J. C. Holmes.

The probate court allowed the demand, and on appeal the action was tried on the files transmitted from the probate court and on an agreed statement of facts, the significance of which, defendants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Whitehead Brothers Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. State v. Glenn Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Mills v. General Ordnance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Patterson v. Imperial Window Glass Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  2. Okerberg v. CrableSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Master Builders Ass'n v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Layne Christensen Co. v. Bro-Tech Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  5. Sullivan v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API