Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Imperial Window Glass Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1914No. 18,409PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court whs delivered by

Porter, J.:

The only question to be determined is whether the trial court rightly denied the plaintiff any relief on the ground that his cause of action grew out of and was based upon an unlawful conspiracy and upon transactions between plaintiff and defendant in violation of the antitrust laws. The question is largely one of procedure., R. M. Patterson, the plaintiff, sued the Imperial Window Glass Company • to recover the sum of $34,946.48 damages for breach of a written contract entered into between himself as lessor of the Osage Window Glass Company…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Coppell v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sage v. Oil Country Specialties Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Okerberg v. CrableSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Mills v. General Ordnance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Gard v. Estate of HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Thacker v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API