Legal Opinion

McGonagill v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1963No. Civ. 7256PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

The petition seeks to estop the trial court from proceeding further with the trial on an information in which defendant was charged in two counts of issuing cheeks without sufficient funds in the bank to meet them.

The contention is that the petitioner has been improperly committed because the municipal court did not exclude all the persons required to be excluded from the courtroom at the time of the preliminary hearing. At the outset of the hearing, counsel for defendant (petitioner) moved: “I would like to make a motion, under Penal Code, section 868, that is, the exclusion of all persons…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. MalloyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. People v. PrizantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Ex parte FentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Penney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. State v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Guerin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Ondarza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API