Williams v. . Woodward
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Tbe court instructed tbe jury tbat it was negligence per se for one to violate “tbe statute regulating tbe conduct and operation of motor vehicles on tbe public highways, and tbe conduct and behavior of pedestrians using tbe highways, but tbe element of proximate cause must also be shown.” This instruction was taken from tbe case of Holland v. Strader, 216 N. C., 436, 5 S. E. (2d), 311, and is correct as applied to violations of tbe motor vehicle law, cb. 407, Public Laws 1937, save and except those provisions which relate to tbe speed limits mentioned therein, any speed in excess of which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Diamond v. McDonald Service StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Holland v. . StraderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Meacham v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Cole v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tarrant Ex Rel. Tarrant v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Williams v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Gladden v. SetzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Pope v. DealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Wellons v. . SherrinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.