Legal Opinion

State v. Penner

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1983No. 7135PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

NMSA 1978, § 31-6-12(A) (Cum.Supp.1983), provides that a witness subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury shall be given thirty-six hours’ notice unless a district judge specifically approves a shorter period. Rogers v. State, 94 N.M. 218, 608 P.2d 530 (Ct.App.1980), held that the thirty-six hours’ notice provision applies to the target of a grand jury investigation. Defendant was given notice that he -was a target, but was not given thirty-six hours’ notice. Defendant moved that the grand jury indictment be dismissed because the thirty-six hours’ notice requirement was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buzbee v. DonnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Maldonado v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Rogers v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. TisthammerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. WeissNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Jennings v. HinkleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API