Legal Opinion
Jennings v. Hinkle
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 1993No. 13183PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
This case involves a claim under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), against two police officers based on the alleged making of false and misleading affidavits for arrest warrants, and on the alleged giving of false and misleading testimony before a grand jury. Third-party plaintiffs Thomas Jennings and Richard Maloney (Jennings and Maloney) appeal an order granting summary judgment in favor of third-party defendants Kyle Hinkle and Terrell Tucker (Hinkle and Tucker), respectively a Deputy Sheriff and Sheriff of Chaves County at the material times, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Silva v. Town of SpringerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wolford v. LasaterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998