Maldonado v. State
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASLEY, Justice.
Maldonado appeals his conviction of criminal trespass. The Court of Appeals summarily affirmed. We affirm.
At issue is whether any court can review the admissibility of evidence presented to a grand jury, although not later used in the trial, and whether Maldonado was denied his right to due process when inadmissible evidence was presented to the grand jury returning his indictment.
The grand jury indicted Maldonado for aggravated burglary and aggravated assault. He was acquitted of these two felonies. However, he was convicted of the included petty misdemeanor of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Ernest Raymond BasurtoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Charles Estepa and Francis VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. J. Joseph Kennedy, United States of America v. Robert J. Myers, United States of America v. Lawrence F. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Buzbee v. DonnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. EdmonsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. UlibarriNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Hennigan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. UlibarriNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.