Legal Opinion

Barton v. Welker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1959No. 41,459PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, C. J.:

This appeal stems from an order of the district court where it was adjudged that appellees were entitled to a fractional portion of a maize crop.

In the interest of clarity, appellees Welker will be sometimes referred to as the lessors and appellants Barton as the lessees.

The facts leading up to this appeal will be related as briefly as the state of the record permits.

On February 2, 1953, Ray X. Welker and Mabel D. Welker, as lessors, entered into a farm lease and .purchase agreement with Láveme and Dorothy Barton, as lessees, for a term…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tate v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  2. Harrison v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Heckard v. ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Matheney v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Sigler v. SiglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kohn v. BabbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Barnes v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Scantlin v. Superior Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API