Legal Opinion

Sigler v. Sigler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1916No. 20,096PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Trego district court; Jacob C. Ruppenthal, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Portee, J.:

The action in the district court was to recover an alleged indebtedness. There were three causes of action, but the error complained of relates to the third cause of action, which was upon a promissory note. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor and made a number of findings of fact. The court approved the findings, but sustained defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, evidence and findings, and this is the ruling we are asked to review.

*526The answer admits the execution of the note but alleges that plaintiff is not the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crumlish's Adm'r v. Cent. Imp. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hastings v. LovejoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Harrison v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Matheney v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. American Bridge Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ralph A. Badger & Co. v. Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'n.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Levine v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. Peoples Exchange Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Garrison v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. McGregor v. Farmers State Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API