Nadhar v. Renaud
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Maria Robien Nadhar, et al., No. CV-21-00275-PHX-DLR 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Tracy Renaud, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Pending before the Court is Defendant Tracy Renaud’s1 motion to dismiss and 17 Plaintiffs’2 motion for sanctions, both of which are fully briefed. (Docs. 15, 18, 19, 29.) 18 For the following reasons, the Court denies both motions. 19 I. Background 20 A. EB-5 Program 21 The EB-5 program allots visas to immigrants who have “invested . . . capital” in a 22 new commercial enterprise (“NCE”)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Coughlin v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.