Herbert v. Pico Ski Area Management Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
¶ 1. This case concerns the ultimate disposition of escrowed funds set aside at the closing on the sale of the Pico Mountain Ski Area. In its summary judgment ruling, the superior court awarded the escrowed funds to Central Vermont Public Service Corporation (CVPS), which was permitted to intervene in the case. On appeal, plaintiffs Harold and Edith Herbert contend that CVPS was not a third-party beneficiary of the disputed transaction and that they are entitled to the funds. We affirm the superior court’s judgment.
¶ 2. The Herberts operated Pico Mountain Ski Area under a series of successive…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Morrisville Lumber Co., Inc. v. OkcuogluSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Lane v. Town of GraftonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Vermont Real Estate Commission v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Knoll v. ButlerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- Knelman v. Middlebury CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2012
- Callahan v. CallahanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Brown v. City of BarreDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2012
- Hatin v. PhilbrookSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- Knutsen v. DionVermont Superior Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.