Legal Opinion

Callahan v. Callahan

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 26, 2008No. 2007-267PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

V 1. Husband appeals from denial of his Vermont Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. Husband sought relief from a provision in a final divorce order requiring him to pay 25% of his retirement pay to wife, and the court denied the motion because it was untimely filed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying husband’s motion, and we therefore affirm.

¶ 2. The relevant facts are as follows. Husband is a career Air Force officer who retired from active duty in August 2006. Wife served four years in the military, during which time she met husband. Husband…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  3. Cliche v. ClicheSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  4. In Re LyonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Town Highway No. 20Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  2. DeLeonardis v. PageSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. Selitsch v. SelitschCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  4. Spencer v. SpencerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. YoungVermont Superior Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API