Legal Opinion

Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co. v. Wilson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1918No. Docket No. 171PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Fead, J. Assumpsit by the Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Company against Edmund Wilson for brokerage fees received while in plaintiff’s employ. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action to recover the amount which defendant had retained of fees as customs broker, while in plaintiff’s employment as chief clerk at Sault Ste. Marie.

The declaration consisted of the common counts in assumpsit, and the plea was the general issue with a notice of set-off. The facts were stipulated, and counsel for the respective parties agreed, in open court, that there being no question of fact to submit to the jury, the trial court should direct a verdict and judgment to be entered, as might be determined. Briefly stated, the facts as stipulated were as follows;

The plaintiff maintains a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Parish v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Deaton v. LawsonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Day v. Spiral Springs Buggy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Western Maryland Railroad v. Blue Ridge Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Agassiz & Odessa Mutual Fire Insurance v. MagnussonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. McFall v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936
  3. Federal Gravel Co. v. Detroit & MacKinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Union Brokerage Co. v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API