Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 88, Calendar No. 37,719PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson Sharpe, C. J.

The plaintiff, under an agreement entered into with the city of Detroit, acting through its board of water commissioners and confirmed by its common council, for one dollar and other consideration, agreed to construct a 15-foot tunnel from its power plant on the River Rouge to a point south of Jefferson avenue in the city; to erect an intake thereon at that point on land owned by the plaintiff, and to dredge out the “old channel” therefrom to the Detroit river. Its purpose was to secure a supply of water for its manufacturing plant in Dearborn. The third paragraph thereof reads as follows:

‘ ‘…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co. v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bator v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Cleveland v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Thomson v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API