Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony Nicholas Carrion and Fred Solmor

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1987No. 86-1268PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Anthony Nicholas Carrion appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court should have instructed the jury on the issue of entrapment. Defendant Fred Solmor appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court erred in imposing consecutive sentences for possession with intent to distribute and distribution, in denying severance of the two defendants’ trials, and in failing to suppress certain evidence. Solmor also argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction under the Travel Act (18 U.S.C. § 1952). We affirm both convictions.

I.…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. United States v. Marvin BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Douglas McClish v. Richard B. NugentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Jose Ramon Hernandez-PalaciosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API