Legal Opinion

Dunn v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1922No. 5 Div. 408PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The indictment contained, in this record fails to show a compliance with the mandatory provisions of section 7300 of the Code 1907, which provides that, in order to find a legal indictment against a person in this state, the concurrence of at least twelve grand jurors is necessary, and, when so found, it must be indorsed “a true bill,” and the indorsement signed by the foreman. The indictment here contains no such indorsement and is in consequence not a valid indictment and will not support a conviction. This identical question has been so decided in numerous decisions of this court and of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. McMullen v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Hanners v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Honeycutt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Layton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Sanford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API