Legal Opinion

Sons v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 9, 1933No. 13697PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice BlEase.

Six separate actions were instituted, in the Court of Common Pleas for Lexington County, against The Federal Land Bank and its codefendant, Josephus Nichols. The several plaintiffs are Lott Sons, Lillie Taylor, Bessie Taylor, Capers Burnett, John S. Ricard, and George W. Ricard. In each case the complaint alleged that the defendants had negligently, willfully and wantonly desecrated a graveyard, or cemetery, the same in each instance, in which one or more of the relatives of the plaintiff had been buried, and damages on that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Spartanburg Ry., Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  2. Barrett v. Broad River Power CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Piper v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. Ryder v. Jefferson Hotel CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Frost v. Columbia Clay CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shuler v. Swift CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  2. Dockside Ass'n v. Detyens, Simmons & CarlisleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Miller v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. DOCK. ASSOC. v. Detyens, Simmons & CarlisleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API