Legal Opinion
Frost v. Columbia Clay Company
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided October 14, 1924No. 11577PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fraser.
The respondents make the following statement:
“As noted in the case for appeal, this was an action commenced in November, 1922, by the plaintiff against the defendants, for damages for the trespassing on and excavating in a graveyard which had formerly been the family burying ground of the plaintiff’s family.
‘The trial Court directed a verdict for the defendant on the ground that the alleged burial place had been abandoned.
“It is admitted that excavations were made in what had formerly been the burying ground o.f the Frost family, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex Parte McCallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
3Cited by11 opinions
- Heiligman v. ChambersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Mayes v. SimonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Stoker v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Bockel v. Fidelity Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Concerned Loved Ones & Lot Owners Ass'n v. PenceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.