Legal Opinion
State v. Tangari
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 4, 1997No. 14967PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a court trial, of larceny in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-122 (a) (4).1 The defendant was found not guilty of a charge of larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123. The defendant asserts that her conviction is fatally flawed because the trial court (1) ineffectively canvassed her when she withdrew her claim for a jury trial and elected to be tried by the court and (2) found her guilty of larceny in the first degree when the evidence was insufficient to establish that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. LittleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. MarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- State v. GoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. ColeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. HentonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. ChapmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.