Legal Opinion

United States v. Faulkenberry

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 28, 2010No. 08-4233, 08-4404PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge.

What is not seriously disputed in this appeal is that National Century Financial Enterprises (NCFE) defrauded its investors of more than $2.4 billion. What is disputed is whether Roger Faulkenberry participated in the fraud. The jury in this case concluded that he did, convicting him of securities fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracies to commit all of those crimes. Faulkenberry now appeals, primarily challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting each conviction. We conclude there was ample evidence to vindicate the jury’s finding of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Kwame KilpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  3. West Hills Farms, LLC v. ClassicStar Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Robert LedbetterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API