Legal Opinion

United States v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 1, 2012No. 09-5987, 09-5998PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

Shirley Cunningham, Jr., and William Gallion were two of three Kentucky lawyers who represented several hundred Kentucky clients in a mass-tort action against the manufacturer of the defective drug “fen-phen.” They settled the case for $200 million, which entitled them under their retainer agreements to approximately $22 million each in attorney fees. But rather than limit themselves to what they had contractually earned, Cunningham and Gallion concocted a fraudulent scheme to take from their clients almost twice that amount. The scheme did not work out…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. King Bradley, Jr. v. Ameristep, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Harry Calcutt III v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  3. McGirr v. RehmeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Ronda NixonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Jason BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API